iTulip.com 
          notes
        Basic theory: An epochal shift in the gold market started in 2001 and 
          has continued, with periods of volatility, at more or less the same 
          trend rate ever since. My theory since 2001 is that the rising gold 
          price trend traces the gradual dissolution of the US$ Treasury system 
          punctuated by crisis and temporary resolution. It will eventually end 
          with a Sudden Stop crisis that I have since 1999 called Ka-Poom Theory, 
          possibly mitigated by a re-opening of the gold window. The Argentina 
          peso bond market crisis of 2001 and 2002 confirms the Ka-Poom Theory 
          which is comprised of two phases, a deflationary phase driven by capital 
          flight and an inflationary phase that results from a currency depreciation. 
          See Argentina's Ka-Poom graph below.
        
 
        
        See also, (VIDEO) 
          Argentina's Economic Collapse. A U.S. version of the Ka-Poom 
          theory, still a work in progress, is mapped below.
        
        
        Notes from: The 
          Next Ten Years--Part II. Over the coming two years (2011-2013), 
          expect to see the economy continue to grow moderately in nominally between 
          2% and 3%, while it continues to shrink in real terms. However, at some 
          point interest rates will begin to rise in response to inflation, even 
          as the output gap continues to put a deflationary bias on consumer prices 
          and wages. That will tend to open the gap even wider, as borrowing costs 
          rise. 
        The recession of 2012-2013 will be created by the withdrawal of fiscal 
          stimulus by the majority Republican 111th Congress. Under conditions 
          of debt deflation, if stimulus is withdrawn before an output gap was 
          closed, recession recurs. This second recession will open the output 
          gap to 6% of GDP. The first recession was from 2007 to 2009. That recession 
          opened the output gap to 4% of GDP. The monetary stimulus of dollar 
          devaluation against oil plus the fiscal stimulus of the Bush and Obama 
          administrations, together these measures closed the output gap from 
          4% to 2% of GDP between 2009 and 2011.
        A recession event in 2012-2013 suggests only one policy option -- monetary 
          inflation -- but several scenarios for achieving it with sufficient 
          political cover to prevent foreign creditors from bolting. The output 
          gap is likely to grow to 8% by 2014. At that point, inflation becomes 
          the only option. We will continue to use public funds to grow the money 
          supply as private sector borrowing remains too weak to do so and monetary 
          policy is now ineffectual. For the next several years, the US will continue 
          to claw its way through the output gap by moving private debt to public 
          account as Japan has since 1992 until either the US runs out of public 
          credit or an external global geopolitical event occurs that has the 
          effect of producing a large spike of inflation. 
        Three factors will influence our investment decisions over the next 
          ten years. 
        
          - China's finance and export based state capitalist system will enter 
            a severe crisis in 2012-2013 as its property bubble collapses.
 
          - The Euro will not end. The eurozone will shrink as weaker debtor 
            economies such as Greece are jettisoned and creditors consolidate 
            economic and political power.
 
          - The world will have three reserve currencies by the end of the decade: 
            the dollar, the euro, and the yuan representing American, European, 
            and Asian trade blocks.
           
        
        2011 to 2020 Uncertainty Era Asset Allocation Rulebook
          
          Rule #1: As long as the US economy remains in an output gap trap, 
          the fiscal position will worsen. When the housing bubble collapsed the 
          US fell into the output gap trap that consigns the US to ever-growing 
          fiscal deficits, at least until the US runs out of public credit. If 
          the US attempts the Japanese method of managing the output gap via fiscal 
          stimulus at the same rate starting in 2000, the US public debt will 
          reach 140% by 2015.
        Rule #2: As long as the US fiscal position worsens, the dollar 
          will weaken. The US cannot grow its public debt to 195% or 140% of GDP, 
          and likely not even 100%, because of the US economy's dependence on 
          imported capital and its gross external debt position. Invariably, for 
          a net debtor, a fiscal deficit puts pressure on the currency.
        
        Rule #3: Periods of high energy costs are periods of poor economic 
          growth and stock market performance. The time to be in the stock market 
          is when inflation is on a falling trend, as it was from 1980 to the 
          year 2000. The worst time to be in stocks is at the beginning of a period 
          of rising inflation. The Argentina peso bond market crisis of 2001 and 
          2002 confirms the Ka-Poom Theory which is comprised of two phases, a 
          deflationary phase driven by capital flight and an inflationary phase 
          that results from a currency depreciation. See here. 
          A new administration will some day place the blame for the crisis on 
          the previous administration and take no responsibility for the hardship 
          that their decisions are about to visit upon us. 
        
        Rule #4: If the US fails to exit its output gap before the next 
          recession, the US will experience a bond and currency crisis several 
          years thereafter, as soon as after the 2012 presidential election or 
          as late as the 2016 presidential election. See here 
          for a US version of the event, still a work in progress.
        Summary
        The 1980 to 2007 credit bubble was an existential economic error akin 
          to the 1920 to 1929 credit bubble. The credit bubble entered its first 
          crisis in 2000. The Greenspan housing bubble was a credit-financed New 
          Deal (akin to the 1930s) that rescued the economy in 2002. The next 
          stock market correction will be driven by the pricing-in of the mid-gap 
          recession (which may have begun in August, 2011). The 2008 to 2009 financial 
          crisis and economic recession was the first phase of the process of 
          debt deflation following the multi-decade credit bubble.
        We are out of private credit needed to finance a next bubble. Within 
          a few years we will be out of public credit needed to move private debt 
          to public account to manage a persistent output gap, debt deflation, 
          and Peak Cheap Oil all at once. Europe's, China's, and US sovereign 
          crises will occur in rapid series over a period of months perhaps starting 
          as soon as 2H 2012. Sovereign credit games in Europe, China, and the 
          US will end in a cascade of sovereign debt defaults and a currency markets 
          crisis that will eventually be resolved through the development of three 
          currency blocks, American, European, and Asian by 2020. 
        
        Social relations among competing interest groups will escalate. Governments 
          will respond to escalating domestic unrest with increasingly repressive 
          surveillance and control. The primary investment challenge of the next 
          ten years is economic and political uncertainty. 
        We will experience the greatest economic and social uncertainty 
          in 100 years over the next ten. 
        
        Notes from: Illusion 
          of Recovery; Global Panic into Gold--Part II. 
        The key thesis of Ka-Poom Theory is that the US will experience a debt 
          and currency crisis if US creditor countries run into economic and political 
          difficulties at home that lead them to calculate that they are better 
          off focusing on domestic policy matters rather than applying resources 
          to support the US in a bid to maintain the US as a viable export market.
        Two ways The Deal (i.e. the arrangement of foreign investment in the 
          US in exchange for US demand for exports) is off. One, the US cannot 
          provide sufficient demand for Asian and European exports. Two, the US 
          in its effort to reflate debt rather than take politically painful steps 
          to write it off depreciates the dollar too far, too fast, exporting 
          inflation abroad. As the US demand engine sputters and inflation rises 
          world wide, foreign investment in the US dries up. This appears to have 
          started in Q1 2010. 
        The rate of foreign purchases of all US securities, of which Treasury 
          bonds are by far the largest part, began to decline in early 2010. Think 
          of it as the slow stop before the sudden stop. Net purchases turned 
          negative in June 2011, the last month reported. I do not think the correction 
          we saw in the stock market starting in July was coincidental. If the 
          trend since early 2010 continued in July and August and then into September, 
          and is joined by sales of US stocks, we may see a good old fashioned 
          autumn stock market crash.
        
        The US$ Treasury based global monetary system began to break down in 
          2001. Since then, the process of breakdown has gone through several 
          stages. When central banks became net buyers in Q1 2009 the breakdown 
          entered a new stage. The reason for the price spike this summer could 
          be as simple as rumors of new central bank purchases on the heels of 
          purchases by the central banks of South Korea and Thailand. More likely 
          a new major buyer has emerged, one that reveals a significant political 
          shift in the system. The list of possible suspects is large and includes 
          Japan at the top of the list. I expect many similar parabolic rises 
          and corrections before the US$ Treasury epoch ends, as speculation about 
          shifting alliances among players drive gold prices.
        
          -  The parabolic rise of the gold/10-Year Treasury bond yield ratio 
            this summer backs up the notion that a new stage of the breakdown 
            has started.
 
          - The tumultuous recent history of currencies priced in gold is driving 
            more and more governments to switch sides, reduce US$ Treasury bond 
            reserve holdings and increase gold holdings.
 
          - Gold purchases and sales by government and international banking 
            institutions since Q1 2000 entered a new phase in Q1 2009. Rumors 
            of new entrants and shifting alliances will drive gold price volatility 
            for the duration of the epoch, and generally up. 
           
        
        The trend in the decline in the exchange rate value of currencies priced 
          in gold is ten years old, and the severe decline is five years old. 
          The trend of government net gold buying is two years old. The trend 
          in the decline in US Treasury bond purchases is 18 months old.